Actuarial Outpost
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Long-Term Actuarial Math
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Salary Surveys
Property & Casualty, Life, Health & Pension

Health Actuary Jobs
Insurance & Consulting jobs for Students, Associates & Fellows

Actuarial Recruitment
Visit DW Simpson's website for more info.

Casualty Jobs
Property & Casualty jobs for Students, Associates & Fellows

Long-Term Actuarial Math Old Exam MLC Forum

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-15-2013, 11:31 PM
Marianopolis Marianopolis is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Studying for Interim Assessment
College: Université Laval Alumnus
Favorite beer: Rickard's Red
Posts: 531

Originally Posted by kittens View Post
I would recommend the TIA seminar, I knew the process for every problem (although did fall into a few tricks, but that was me rushing)
I used TIA and found that there weren't enough practice problems. Got an 11 on PAK and plan on using ASM and ADAPT for the November sitting.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2013, 11:49 PM
ArsenalActuary ArsenalActuary is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Studying for QFI Advanced
Posts: 99

I used TIA and it was excellent. The best part of the course was the review videos that not only review the material but also have problems that are of the "new exam style." Also, TIA's sample exams are a great preparation for the real exam since many of the problems are very long and tedious. I knew how to solve every single problem on the exam, however I made a few mistakes, and have a 21 on the PAK.

FSA Modules


Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2013, 11:50 PM
Idioteque's Avatar
Idioteque Idioteque is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 988

Honestly, if you want to go into the exam confident that you are actually prepared, I would cram 2 week subscription of ADAPT and get to a level 7 regardless of which study materials you used to learn the material.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 08:51 AM
Bama Gambler's Avatar
Bama Gambler Bama Gambler is offline
James Washer / Notes Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: B'ham, AL
Posts: 17,241

Originally Posted by ditkaworshipper View Post
One peeve on TIA is that the practice exams only had video solutions, and I don't get why he wouldn't include the PDF since that is sometimes sufficient for the student. When I was working with my friend on questions he missed in those practice exams, it took us longer than necessary for some that were rather trivial problems and we just wanted to see if the instructor used a different methodology.
TIA sample exams really aren't supposed to be shared.

There are PDF solutions of the sample exams. It is the lesson before the first video solution to each exam.

We help people pass actuarial exams.

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 09:11 AM
bpharvey10's Avatar
bpharvey10 bpharvey10 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: State of Displacement
Studying for My Job
College: Spaceballs U
Favorite beer: RC Cola/Yeti Oak-Aged Stout
Posts: 614

Went with both ASM and Coaching Actuaries/ADAPT. Didn't really do ADAPT at all (still sitting at the baseline 3 level) and just did ASM practice problems and PEs. Got a 21 on the PAK, I think.
"You, sir, are technically correct. And that is the best kind of correct to be."

pit-bull = data

Prelims: 1 2 3F MLC 4
FCAS: 7 8 9
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 09:43 AM
glitter glitter is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 97

I used a combination of TIA and Adapt. TIA was excellent for learning the material and the round the clock support was so appreciated. Lee answered each and every one of my questions thoroughly and in a timely manner. I too felt like they could have had some more sample exams though. These were hard, but very good for drilling the concepts. I found myself filling in study time with Adapt because I did not have enough TIA sample exams to do.

Adapt was also really good for spotting areas of weakness. I got to an earned level of 7.5 but I still think all the exams I did on Adapt were easier than the real exam. My nerves probably had a great part to play though. I would recommend getting to Adapt level 8 (and not 7 as recommended) to feel comfortable.

16 on PAK. Could have done better if I had just relaxed a bit!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 10:59 AM
Primus257 Primus257 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: MI
Favorite beer: Lagunitas
Posts: 230

I used ASM and 1 month of ADAPT. Basically, I worked my way through the ASM material from January through March, and then spent April doing ASM and ADAPT practice exams. Also went through the three released exams (2007, M2012, and N2012) and the SOA 309. I worked my way up to a 10 on ADAPT, but anything over 7 is sufficient, I think.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 11:02 AM
rikkiyao rikkiyao is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 143

TIA Learning + ASM Practice Problems! TIA Learning is great, but to enhance your understanding, you have to do more problems. TIA doesn't have a whole lot of problems, so find more problems, where? ASM manual! This combination is definitely sufficient!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 01:59 PM
thom thom is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New England
Studying for Exam 8
College: of Charleston
Posts: 228

I don't really understand the idea that the practice problems we have aren't like the real thing... I took a couple of quizzes on ADAPT two days before the exam that totaled 10 problems or so, and two of them were on the real exam (possibly with slight differences). I think they both came from the SOA300, but I'm not sure.

Compared to C, where the real exam looked quite alien my first time through, I think MLC is pretty straightforward about what you're expected to know and how they are going to ask you about it. I didn't think anything on this exam was even particularly tricky.--if it was, the SOA300 had me so prepared I didn't notice.
7 8 9
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 02:42 PM
jamesy628 jamesy628 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boston
Favorite beer: Goose Island - 312
Posts: 362

Combination of Jim D's seminar to learn the material and follow-up with TIA to solidify some concepts and use the end of review sections + Spring 2012, Fall 2012, and about half of the SOA 300 and accidentally drinking too much the night before - 19 on PAK. Life is good.

I spent the entire read-through time in the restroom and got up twice to use the restroom during the exam.

I think the reason why I personally did well is that I had zero stress going in. I wasn't confident but knew that any negativity would cause a sure fail. So, I said, I've got this and remained calm.
Reply With Quote

exercises, mlc, mlc spring 2013, soa, study

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.44287 seconds with 9 queries